A Liberal Teacher Just Learned A REALLY Hard Lesson After Calling For Justice Kavanaugh’s Assassination…

By and large, liberals have this terribly misconception of what the First Amendment actually means. Find any random liberal and ask them any question on anything under the sun and you will see that almost immediately.

They tend to think that they can quite seriously, say anything that they want and not get in trouble for it. Under their twisted interpretation of the rules they think they can spout whatever gibberish that they feel that they want to spout without getting in any trouble.

Just so everyone is clear, this is freedom of speech in a nutshell. Say you walked into your job tomorrow and called your boss a jerk and spent the next five minutes shouting obscenities at them.

Now, you can’t be tried criminally for calling your boss a jerk but he can fire you on the spot. Liberals think that if they were in that same scenario that not only would they not immediately lose their job but the boss would be fired for infringing on their rights and that they would get HIS job.

Also, it’s outright scary how many people that are employed in the practice of allegedly educating our children that simply do not know either the difference or have the sense to realize that there are certain things you should not say…

A Minnesota teacher who called for the death of Brett Kavanaugh on Twitter has been suspended with pay after the threat was reported to the FBI, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported.

The unnamed teacher, who goes by the Twitter handle @lookitsSammm, got her fifteen minutes of viral infamy after the minatory tweet on Saturday, according to the Star Tribune.

“So whose (sic) going to take one for the team and kill Kavanaugh?” @lookitsSammm wrote.

As expressing political rage goes, this wasn’t a particularly great idea, particularly when it happened just hours after Kavanaugh was confirmed by the Senate:

View image on Twitter

The not-good-idea-iness factor of this whole thing was significantly heightened by the fact that the tweeter was a Rosemount, Minnesota, educator — and there are bigger issues with that than the fact a teacher doesn’t know the difference between “whose” and “who’s.”

“The teacher, listed as an instructor at the Intermediate School District 917’s Alliance Education Center, has since deleted her Twitter account but her tweet was captured and shared by scores of users who said they reported it to the FBI and U.S. Secret Service,” the Star Tribune reported.

As an aside here, I can understand deleting a tweet after it becomes clear you’ve said something cretinous (or possibly illegal). No, it’s not going to stop the whirlwind of problems you’ve invited upon yourself, but I suppose it at least shows some good sense. Deleting your account, however, just makes you look very guilty. For every soi-disant Twitter politics expert who could see themselves typing out something this addle-pated in the future, please keep this in mind when you eventually decide to say something profoundly asinine and/or felonious.

So, back to @lookitsSammm. Mark Zuzek, the superintendent of Intermediate School District 917, acknowledged they’d received a complaint regarding her social media musings and that she was “on paid leave pending the outcome of the investigation,” according to a statement on the center’s website.

“Pursuant with the data practices act, we are limited to providing additional information regarding this matter,” Zuzek added in the statement.

In an ideal universe, that “investigation” would consist of this:

Superintendent Zuzek: So, uh, did you tweet this garbage?@lookitsSammm: That depends on what the definition of “tweet” is.Superintendent Zuzek: Is there any possible way I can verbalize an ellipsis? No?@lookitsSammm: [heavy sigh] I have my First Amendment rights, Superintendent Zuzek. I, for one, believe all survivors, and you should, too. I was merely–Superintendent Zuzek: Good luck with your next job.

Of course, our unidentified educator has a bit more to worry about than her employment status. There’s also a law enforcement investigation to consider.

Read More

44 Comments

  1. Robert June 14, 2019
    • Beel June 15, 2019
      • Jon June 17, 2019
    • Mike Thomas June 17, 2019
  2. Don Nicholas June 14, 2019
    • Clifton Palmer McLendon June 17, 2019
  3. ANNIE June 15, 2019
    • Bartman June 15, 2019
    • Harry June 15, 2019
  4. masr June 15, 2019
    • Btb June 19, 2019
  5. Glenn Shannon June 15, 2019
    • Skip June 15, 2019
      • Barbaree June 17, 2019
  6. Grizz Mann June 15, 2019
    • Eddie G. June 17, 2019
  7. Wayne June 15, 2019
  8. Phyllis June 15, 2019
    • Barbaree June 17, 2019
  9. Veteran June 15, 2019
  10. allan w allen June 15, 2019
  11. Bill Hall June 15, 2019
    • Robert Miller June 17, 2019
    • Barbara June 17, 2019
  12. Drhook June 15, 2019
  13. Kurt Bloom June 16, 2019
    • Hubert Paulson June 17, 2019
  14. Ronald Boyle June 16, 2019
  15. JMichael270 June 16, 2019
  16. william jackson June 16, 2019
  17. Rivahmitch June 16, 2019
  18. Mike F June 16, 2019
  19. Mike F June 16, 2019
    • Clifton Palmer McLendon June 17, 2019
  20. jim June 16, 2019
  21. Sam June 17, 2019
  22. marion tinsley June 17, 2019
  23. marion tinsley June 17, 2019
  24. ox June 17, 2019
  25. JD June 17, 2019
  26. Shirley Slater June 17, 2019
    • Sam June 17, 2019
  27. iitywybad June 18, 2019
  28. alex June 20, 2019

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.